Search for: "Washington v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 20
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 3:24 pm
By: Erica Shelley Nelson & Sarah Burke In Busey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:07 am
Earlier this week, the state of Washington finally took its first step to implement the school funding remedy first mandated in McCleary v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
The complaint in DeBoom v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 12:31 pm
And in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 9:06 am
Uttecht, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:48 am
The Washington Post has a summary of a new book, Race to the Bottom: Corporate Reform and the Future of Public Education (Apr. 2015) by Michael V. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:15 am
Dist., No. 06-0708-CV 67, (USCA, 2d Cir.)The superintendent of the Port Washington Union Free School District, Dr. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 1:01 am
Lemeul Penn, born September 19, 1915, was the Assistant Superintendent of Washington, D.C. public schools, a decorated veteran of World War II, a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army Reserve, and the father of three young children. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:47 pm
In Seattle School District v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:33 am
Term appointments of employees in the Classified ServiceWheeler v Washington Co., 259 AD2d 902Term appointments are rare in the classified service. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 45301 Olympia, WA 98504-5301 Phone: (360) 902-8001 (V/TTY), (800) 422-7930 (Toll Free) TTY: (800) 422-7941 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.dshs.wa.gov Eastern Assistive Technology Resource Center West 606 Sharp Spokane, WA 99201 Phone: (800) 214-8731 (V/TTY); (509) 328-9350 (V/TTY) Fax: (509) 326-2261 E-mail: Spokane@seals.org Web: http://wata.org/wata/eatrc/index.htm Washington Assistive Technology Center Washington Coalition of Citizens with… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 1:46 pm
After 34 years, Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:15 pm
(Dan Keating and V. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:28 am
Reviewing en banc the appeal of a jury award in favor of a male ironworker who was allegedly sexually harassed by a superintendent because he wasn’t manly enough, the Fifth Circuit, in a 10-6 decision, found sufficient evidence that the harassment was because of the employee’s sex and was sufficiently severe and pervasive to alter his work environment (EEOC v Boh Brothers Construction Co, LLC, September 27, 2013). [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:44 am
It is probably less known that under Washington's Stute v. [read post]
