Search for: "Washington v. Yakima Indian Nation" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
By the time of the oral argument, even the Lundgrens admitted that the only basis for that distinction was the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in County of Yakima v Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, and the justices who discussed the question at the argument seemed to think Yakima could not support such a broad intrusion on sovereign immunity. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
Gorsuch’s opinion holds that a 1992 decision involving Indian tribes, County of Yakima v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court’s holding in County of Yakima (1992), the majority observed that the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” At Balkinization, David Gans argues that the plaintiffs’ “arguments—which fly in the face of our Constitution’s promise of equal representation for all—would undermine minority representation both in Texas . . . and throughout the nation,” and he adds that recent “events in Yakima, Washington, provide a good example. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Gregoire, et al.Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-35776 September 23, 2011 Judge: Smith Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law, Tax Law The Tribes of the Yakima Nation claimed that the principle of Indian tax immunity had been violated by the State of Washington's current cigarette excise tax, which the Tribes argued left their retailers liable for payment of the tax when retailers… [read post]