Search for: "Waterkeeper Alliance v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Several parties challenged the 2003 revisions (the 2003 Rule), and the Second Circuit reviewed the challenges in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:17 pm
On February 28, 2005, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals put a bit of a wrench in the EPA's plans to increase animal feedlot regulations when the Court announced its decision in the case of Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision in Waterkeeper Alliance et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:11 pm
The Appeals Court concluded that "this is an expansion of EPA’s remedial power not authorized by the governing statutes," and reversed and remanded the decision for redetermination of the penalty.The Eighth Circuit said in part, "As the Second Circuit held in invalidating a portion of EPA’s regulations governing concentrated animal feeding operations, 'unless there is a "discharge of any pollutant," there is no violation of the Act, and… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
The case is Waterkeeper Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:13 am
"If this matter is remanded to EPA for further administrative consideration, there will be nothing before this Court for briefing," EPA says.EPA's filing is in response to a June 28 filing from environmentalists in the suit, Waterkeeper Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:19 pm
An organization called the Environmental Integrity Project, as well as other citizen groups from Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Sierra Club, and the Waterkeeper Alliance (collectively, the "petitioners"), have petitioned Lisa P. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:10 am
Opponents of the 2003 rule successfully thwarted this attempt in Waterkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:36 pm
In 2005, in Waterkeeper Alliance et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:52 pm
” This EPA rule was challenged and struck down in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
EPA Environmental Protection Administration 09a0004p.06 Waterkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
EPA Environmental Protection Administration 09a0004p.06 Waterkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
The standing case is Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
The brief for Waterkeeper Alliance and other environmental groups adds that the Clean Water Rule was actually promulgated jointly by the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers, and thus is not strictly an action by “the [EPA] Administrator,” as Section 1369(b)(1) specifies. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 2, 2009 U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 2, 2009 U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– EPA News Release, July 28, 2010 The U.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
EPA and AVX Corporation. [read post]
