Search for: "Waters v. State of Alabama"
Results 1 - 20
of 321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
Docket: 08-199 Title: Georgia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm
(municipality, as successor to a private water company, does not enjoy against the State the same constitutional rights as the water company: "The relations existing between the State and the water company were not the same as those between the State and the City"). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am
Railroads must pay the tax, but state law exempts railroads’ most direct competitors (commercial trucking and water carriers) from the tax. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
District Judge Jeffrey V. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
District Judge Jeffrey V. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
District Judge Jeffrey V. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:55 am
There is one CVSG in Alabama Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:41 am
Railroads pay a 4 percent sales tax and a 4 percent use tax to the state of Alabama when they purchase or consume diesel fuel. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:15 am
It is my understanding that Alabama is the last state in the Union with this law. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:16 pm
The 11th Circuit gave environmentalists a narrow victory Wednesday, ruling 2-1 that water utilities in Florida could not challenge a settlement between EPA and environmental groups that sets a timeline for adoption of numeric nutrient standards for Florida waters (Florida Wildlife Fed’n v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:15 am
It is my understanding that Alabama is the last state in the Union with this law. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:15 am
It is my understanding that Alabama is the last state in the Union with this law. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 11:33 am
A date with the Supreme Court: Florida v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
