Search for: "Watkins v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Through the TPS program, Congress has given the Secretary of Homeland Security discretion to protect people in the United States from deportation if their home countries are unsafe to accept their return. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), the Supreme Court of the United States considered prosecutorial immunity in the context of section 1983 actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, he heard about them at a meeting of an organization called Parents of New York United (P.O.N.Y.U.), a conservative group from Watkins Glen, in far-western New York, which had compiled a list of objectionable books and given it to the Long Island school-board members. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Chapa and Beth Watkins) that the general Texas judicial-proceedings privilege applies to the statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am by jonathanturley
Professor Andrew Bond denounced the United States as a “sh*t nation” and then invited conservatives to quote him. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day, O’Callaghan J made an order for costs in the case of Watkins v Tatana [2023] FCA 248, in favour of the Respondents. [read post]