Search for: "Watkins v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm
Moe, United States Air Force (ret.) [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws preempt several provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
United States, it seems the government had decided that it agreed with plaintiff Michael Greenlaw on the main sentencing-related issue in the case. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm
United States which held that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program conflicted with limits on executive authority in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. at 1045-47 (holding state could not criminalize teaching of German language to pupils who had not yet passed eighth grade); Watkins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Yeakey, No. 142658, be held in abeyance pending the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions in People v Pullen (No. 142751) and People v Watkins (No. 142031), which may resolve an issue raised in the application. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
” Among prosecutors in Texas — and the rest of the country — Watkins is a rare breed. [read post]
