Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2025, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B. (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 585, to find the employer liable even though the violent incident, which resulted in applicant’s death, occurred on a public street after applicant finished work. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:59 pm by Greg Mersol
On Sloan’s heels, the Northern District of Ohio addressed the same issues in Watkins v. [read post]