Search for: "Watson v. Industrial Commission"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle),… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465, 472 & n.2 (Cust. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:19 am
In Watson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:54 am
Watson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Watson clearly signals that private actors in heavily regulated industries such as drug companies, medical equipment makers and nuclear power plants cannot rely solely on their status as regulated entities to assert a right to removal. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:13 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in five cases Monday, including Watson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
This morning, the Court will hear oral argument in Watson v. [read post]
