Search for: "Watson v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jones, providing that for a hierarchical church (i.e., a church organized where local branches are situated within a larger structural tier), the secular tribunal should defer to the decision of the church’s hierarchical authority; and (2) the “neutral principles” method endorsed in the 1979 case Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Watson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Watson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 1:02 am by Steve Lubet
Under the cover of night, without a single word, the Supreme Court effectively extinguished Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
  Arag Plc v Jones & Anor (2020) EWHC 3484 (Comm) Mr Jones and Ms Gibson had brought a disrepair claim against their landlord Mr Francis. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The Case: Raichura v Jones Briefly, Jones represented Raichura in a family law dispute in 2005. [read post]