Search for: "Watson v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:49 am by William Weinberg
Known as a “Watson Murder” charge, this crime gets its name from a California Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) At least as of this evening, with a search from the Washington, DC area (a necessary caveat):united states v. lopez united states v. carroll towing co. united states v. morrison united states v. jones united states v. comstock united states v. virginia united states v. booker united states v. nixon united states v.… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:49 pm by Thomas Long
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1785, 10 February 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
Because of the holding in People v Watson, you may be charged with second-degree murder under California Penal Code section 187. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 3:05 am by Paul Caron
Schwidetzky (Baltimore), Musings on Watson and the John Edwards Sub S Tax Shelter: Last December, an Iowa federal district court came out with a decision on the “John Edwards gambit” (Watson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” PPG Indus., Inc., 75 F.3d at 1564 (citation and quotation omitted).ANDSee United States v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Watson”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that claim 4 of U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here is a bit more explanation of the odd case of Robertson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by Brian A. Comer
Instead, the concurring opinion cites to the framework cited in State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Not a line I expected to read in a brief, but there it is, in the state’s brief in Watson v. [read post]