Search for: "Watson v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,066
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Hayley Evans
While some, such as Security Minister Ben Wallace, argue that Tuesday’s ruling in SSHD v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 30 January 2018, in the case of Watson v Home Secretary ([2018] EWCA Civ 70) confirmed that section 1 of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 was inconsistent with EU in certain important respects. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:41 am by Ruthann Robson
Watson, United States District Judge Daniel Crabtree enjoined Kansas officials from enforcing Kan. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:58 am by Jon Gelman
Watson v 84 Lumber CP 2009-15740 (NJ DWC 2016) Decided: 12.15.2016“One of the primary benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act is that of medical benefits. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
However the government has acknowledged that the mandatory communications data retention provisions of the Act are unlawful in the light of the Watson/Tele2 decision of the CJEU. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
However the government has acknowledged that the mandatory communications data retention provisions of the Act are unlawful in the light of the Watson/Tele2 decision of the CJEU. [read post]