Search for: "Watson v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 979
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction  This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
“On Friday 13 February the Judicial Office was made aware of the existence of a summons containing certain allegations against a number of individuals including part-time sheriff Peter Watson.The Lord President’s Private Office immediately contacted Mr Watson and he offered not to sit as a part-time sheriff on a voluntary basis, pending the outcome of those proceedings.Mr Watson e-mailed a copy of the summons to the Lord President’s Private Office on Saturday 14… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Watson Laboratories, Inc., No. 16-493 (pre-AIA, do secret sales count as prior art?) [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The CJEU’s recent decision in the Tele2/Watson case may call the viability of the new Investigatory Powers Act into question. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
The CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, although about the existing DRIPA legislation, will require changes to the IP Act. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
The CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, although about the existing DRIPA legislation, will require changes to the IP Act. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:46 am by INFORRM
The decision in Watson clearly leaves the communications data model in the new legislation on shaky legal ground. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Merck & Cie v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Watson Laboratories, Inc., No. 16-493 (pre-AIA, do secret sales count as prior art?) [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
” Tom Watson said it was “deeply regrettable” that the victims of press intrusion now face a further wait for a decision”. [read post]