Search for: "Watson v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
The case of Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the Secretary for State for the Home Department and the UK security and intelligence agencies (SIAs) (Case C-623/17) concerns the conditions under which SIAs may process communications metadata (i.e. traffic and location data, not message content) collected by telecommunications providers. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Maine In Jones v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
AdoreMe, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:19 am
In the 1994, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
We're proud to announce a new updated version of The State of Communications Privacy Laws in eight Latin American countries and Spain. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
Dietz & Watson, Inc.). [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
Dietz & Watson, Inc.). [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 6:58 am
Watson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And I was representing the United States as an amicus to Ohio, and I had not actually written the briefs in this case. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
Boilerplate language has been held insufficient in California and other states—a good example being Watson Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court stated that for a Court to assess the bona fides of a validity challenge to the arbitration agreement that only a Court can resolve requires: (a) First, the court must determine whether, assuming the facts pleaded to be true, there is a genuine challenge to arbitral jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:25 pm
From JDSupra: City of Fort Myers General § Employees’ Pension Fund v Haley, which was commenced in the Delaware Court of Chancery, grew out of the merger of equals between Towers Watson & Co. and... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
In re Towers Watson & Co. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Well, friends, Watson v. [read post]
