Search for: "Watts v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
The district court denied the State's motion but ruled it would require Grady to establish at trial a proper foundation for the admission of any proffered alternate suspect evidence under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:12 pm by Andrew Delaney
Lender wants SCOV not to apply the decisions it made in those cases to the Watts case because the facts in the Watts case happened before those cases were decided.Lender wants SCOV to use the “rule of selective prospectivity” which has a 3-part test, and was articulated in a United States Supreme Court case in 1971. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am by Robert Kraft
Watts On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
Acquitted conduct has been used here in the Sixth Circuit, and the Court elaborated on this issue in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:00 am
Circuit did not accept this challenge and ruled in favor of PCAOB and the United States. [read post]