Search for: "Watts v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
United States, a major ruling on military commissions. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm by Anna Christensen
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition for respondent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Brief in opposition for the United States Brief for the United States Petitioners’ reply FEBRUARY SITTING: McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
Ethan Yale (Georgetown University Law Center) and Brian Galle (Florida State University College of Law) have a new paper that analyzes the Court's United Haulers opinion, and its implications for the recently granted case of Davis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Eisen (@NormEisen), Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Siven Watt (@SivenWatt), Francois Barrilleaux (@FrenchwaEB), Sasha Matsuki and Arava Rose United Nations The United Nations in Hindsight: UN Security Council Sanctions by Paul Romita (@PaulRomita), Erik Ramberg (@ErikTRamberg) and Karin Landgren (@LandgrenKarin) National Security at the United Nations This Week (Nov. 27-Dec. 1) by Ian Allen Podcast: Counterterrorism and Surveillance The Just Security Podcast:… [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:12 pm by Andrew Delaney
Lender wants SCOV not to apply the decisions it made in those cases to the Watts case because the facts in the Watts case happened before those cases were decided.Lender wants SCOV to use the “rule of selective prospectivity” which has a 3-part test, and was articulated in a United States Supreme Court case in 1971. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
The district court denied the State's motion but ruled it would require Grady to establish at trial a proper foundation for the admission of any proffered alternate suspect evidence under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]