Search for: "Watts v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 5:58 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
” Watt, 50 M.J. at 105 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am by Danielle C. Quinn, Stephen P. Younger
”[29]  The Court determined that the purpose of the “Service of Suit Clause” was to assure insurance policy holders that the underwriter defendants would be amenable to suit in the United States.[30]  Because the clause at issue did not contain “mandatory language binding the parties to a particular forum,” the “submit to” jurisdiction language was insufficient to require that any litigation be brought in New York.[31] Although… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
In the same period, module prices declined from about $0.94/watt to about $0.39/watt. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
In the same period, module prices declined from about $0.94/watt to about $0.39/watt. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
True threats, as the United States Supreme Court defines them, are “those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:12 pm by Andrew Delaney
Lender wants SCOV not to apply the decisions it made in those cases to the Watts case because the facts in the Watts case happened before those cases were decided.Lender wants SCOV to use the “rule of selective prospectivity” which has a 3-part test, and was articulated in a United States Supreme Court case in 1971. [read post]