Search for: "Wax's Case"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 10:08 am
This is a case making the rounds of the employment law blogosphere for its salaciousness and silliness. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:56 am
A propos L'Affaire Wax, Dean Chemerinsky (Berkeley) is quoted in this article: I loathe what Amy Wax has said....But academic freedom protects her right to... [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:45 am
A classic example of a case which probably could not be won. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:45 am
And, in case it wasn't clear: 22. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:06 am
The reporter says that Dean Ruger's move to sanction Wax threatens "one of tenure’s key... [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:47 am
As I've noted before (also here), most of Penn's case against Amy Wax involves trying to punish her for her lawful extramural speech, and is... [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:53 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark HONEYCOMB WAXING STUDIO for body waxing services [WAXING STUDIO disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the mark HONEYCOMB SALON & Design for hair salon services [SALON disclaimed]. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellate court upheld an original ruling in a trademark infringement case filed by Maker’s Mark back in 2003. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:14 am
Applicant sought to register the mark STRIPT WAX BAR & Design for "body waxing services for the human body" [WAX BAR disclaimed], but Examining Attorney John Kelly issued a Section 2(d) refusal in view of the registered mark THE WAX BAR for "body waxing services. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
However, attorneys for Fortune Brands believe that the crux of the case involves the dripping red wax seal and not the other distinguishing traits about the bottle or its contents. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
In this case, Pyrrha Design does not claim ownership of copyright in the process of making the wax seal jewellery but copyright in the expression of it found in the Designs. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Following up on my previous posts (links below): Philadelphia Inquirer, Penn Hearing Board Recommended Sanctions Against Amy Wax in June, but Her Appeal Means the Process Isn’t Over: The case against controversial University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax — who has called into question the academic ability of Black... [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
The questions most commonly involve wax and cartridges, so this post takes a look at the issues surrounding those cases (leaving the skin patches and edibles for another day). [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit released its judgment which upheld an original ruling in a trademark infringement case between Maker's Mark and Jose Cuervo International that dates back to 2003. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:13 pm
Such is the case here. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:05 am
New York Sun, Tenured Professor Amy Wax, Under Siege for ‘Truth Telling’ on Race, Makes Her Case: The future of tenure in American higher education could turn on the fate of a septuagenarian professor who teaches law at the University of Pennsylvania who has an intense mien and history of... [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:44 am
In that case, the judge did not award damages to Maker's Mark, saying that although Casa Cuervo violated the trademark, it had not focused its marketing efforts on the red wax seal to the extent of damaging the Maker's Mark brand. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:04 pm
And in news coverage, Ximena Conde of The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that “Penn Law’s Amy Wax makes her case to college professors, hoping to gain their support; Facing a disciplinary hearing at Penn Law over controversial remarks made over the years, Amy Wax tried to win over faculty across the country in attempt to pressure her school to drop hearing plans. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
We found a couple of cases involving negligent waxing and they had absolutely nothing to do with hirsutism. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:28 am
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, as an assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, she argued 15 cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
