Search for: "Way v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 66,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Professor Maldonado points out, anti-miscegenation laws were, at one point or another between 1661 and 1967, in effect in 41 states. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Charles P. Romano, Ph.D.
Prior to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Industries v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm by Andrew Vey
Bear in mind that the requirement for consideration is a two-way street. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
AI regulatory systems differently at the margins; each, however, is meant to be consumed in the way way and toward the same ends. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
The same act can be characterized in two very different ways. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Hannah Rigby (Bristows)
They were dealt with in a similar way by Mr Justice Richards (see [2023] EWHC 2591 (Ch)). [read post]