Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1 - 20 of 7,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
He asked, "What do we do with the Free Enterprise Fund case where the Chief Justice said people don't vote for officers of the United States? [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:10 am by Eric Segall
When the Constitution's text is crystal clear (e.g., each state gets two Senators) we don't need to argue about methods of interpretation or likely consequences. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:05 am by Will Newman
  We dont have broad discovery, so I like to use the seizure of evidence to pressure other parties. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 2:13 pm by David Oscar Markus
  And don't get me started on the probation officers... why do they have a say in this at all? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
You might think the private prosecutor in Young would be subject to the same principle, because prosecutors don't succeed unless a judge eventually agrees with them. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Stay informed about the progress of your case, and don't hesitate to ask questions. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 A more pessimistic reading of the argument is that the conservative Justices didn't ask about the removal or nondelegation issues because they don't think they will need to reach them, as they plan to rule for Jarkesy on the Seventh Amendment ground. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am by Sasha Volokh
This taxonomy divides nondelegation rules into three categories: (1) giver-based, i.e., don't delegate power that you can't grant; (2) recipient-based, i.e., don't delegate power to entities that can't exercise it; and (3) application-based, i.e., don't delegate power where the circumstances of its application will be unjust. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  Prelogar responded, "We don't think dangerousness is the standard with law-abiding, and I recognize you might have some different views on that, Justice Barrett. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As I explained in my article, Dont Compound the Caremark Mistake by Extending it to ESG Oversight , Caremark has the potential to convert aspirational goals into legal mandates. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by Sasha Volokh
We could call all these doctrines "nondelegation doctrines," but we shouldn't let the similar nomenclature confuse us into thinking that they're the same doctrine. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:25 pm by Texas Legal News
Dont hesitate to get in touch with our team if you have concerns regarding how fault and negligence impact your Dallas personal injury claim. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by Gary Burger
  Negotiation: You don't want to face the defendant’s insurance companies alone. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by Gary Burger
  Negotiation: You don't want to face the defendant’s insurance companies alone. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
And even speech that may not be criminalized is subject to the lesser opprobrium of a judicial sanction when it occurs during and threatens to derail litigation, as here….The post Don't Ask a Judge to Rule for You and Then Send Him a Death Threat appeared first on [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:51 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  He wrote: But we don't presume that citizens are dangerous criminals. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am by Eugene Volokh
" To determine whether a defendant's publication falls "within the purview of the prescribed 'other medium' entitled to presuit notice, we look to the Ross decision to determine whether the [defendant's publication] is operated to further the free dissemination of information or disinterested and neutral commentary or editorializing as to matters of public interest. [read post]