Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
United States:JUSTICE SCALIA: Actually, why don't we just abolish the exclusionary rule? [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 4:39 am
* We don't mind the long hours or the tough decisions. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:22 pm
But I don't think their results aren't coincidental. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Slip op. at 12.We don't really see the need for the lengthy discussion (although we're happy with the result), because the defendant's warnings - about PPH - were adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:01 am
So, in the modern era we've figured out the language and the appellate courts use the language and standards they have developed.Don't they? [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 11:08 am
We're just too fed up right now by the lack of accountability from Kathy Rundle and Don Horn to write anything else until we calm down. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
The courts don't get that.Which makes it all the more important that we do.h/t John Wesley Hall [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
" I don't know if that story is true but if not it ought to be. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
I don't know. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
This seems like an instance where there's a backstory that explains most of what's going on that we just don't know right now. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:57 am
" As long as we're going to have the death penalty, I don't think a scoundrel who enlists a hit man is less culpable than the person who pulled the trigger himself. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 2:05 pm
Personally, I don’t see how putting someone in jail for longer because she insisted on her right to a jury trial can be recharacterized as a benefit to some other defendant who pleads guilty. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm
As previously noted (here), we try to update on most favorable appellate cases, but we often don't get notice of unpublished affirmances in state's appeals, because the ADO is usually not counsel of record.Here is a search of the last seven months of 2009, which turned up a lot of great trial/appellate work by defenders. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Beyond that, setting them aside is what we do.If we can't do that, we're in the wrong business.If we don't understand that, we may defend the criminally accused, but we're not criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 am
We don't know if there are many public defenders regularly reading ATL. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:46 pm
We didn't need to be clairvoyant to predict what would happen.The post reported on a study that sentences were indeed increasingly dependent on which judge was assigned to the case.Today the United States Sentencing Commission issued a report titled Intra-City Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
We don't know, but in Lee v Pierre 2011 NY Slip Op 32911(U); November 1, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County;Docket Number: 403536/10; Judge: Anil C. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:55 pm
I don't believe that is a possibility for him.';'After the hearing, Nurik said that 30 years was an exaggeration -- he said he met Rothstein when he was a student in his trial advocacy class at Nova Southeastern University law school. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:07 pm
We mostly don't represent the erroneously charged. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:08 pm
And I don't know why.I've heard the theories. [read post]
