Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1 - 20 of 2,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 9:25 am by rgeorges
We don't allow any outside influence to mess with juror decisions; so that only relevant and admissible evidence can be said to bear on the decision. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:33 am
After 18+ years of defending criminal cases in Orlando, it's common to hear "well, we don't do PTI here", or "we don't do youthful offender here", etc etc. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:40 am by John M. Kaman
 So you will tend to believe a cop even if you really try to be neutral and you will say to yourself "something must have been done and badly done or we wouldn't be having a trial.This leads to the biggest joke of all which is that the defendant is not obligated to take the stand and the jury shall not take his/her silence as evidence of guilt. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
The jury’s still out on that, but judging from the Mensing reargument petition, which we discussed here, one oddball claim under serious consideration by the other side is the notion that a defendant can have a common-law obligation simply not to sell its product at all.In other words, the flavor du jour in generic cases could be failure to recall, resurrected from what has to date been extensive and well-deserved judicial repudiation.While we don’t… [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
May 14, 2007), an Alabama state court judge reached the same conclusion in a metoclopramide/Reglan case:The majority of courts that have considered the issues presented in this case have found that only the manufacturer of the generic drug which was sold are liable.   [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:58 am by Randall Hodgkinson
We try to update on most favorable appellate cases, but we often don't get notice of unpublished affirmances in state's appeals, because the ADO is usually not counsel of record. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:58 pm by Jeff Gamso
They do so at the expense of the defendant. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:31 am by Jeff Gamso
The courts don't get that.Which makes it all the more important that we do.h/t John Wesley Hall [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
 I'll always vote to kill - unless the aggravating circumstances don't outweigh mitigation (which, and now mumbling they always do because the guy is dead and the defendant's a killer who, Q.E.D., should be killed.)It's a dance and a farce. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:00 pm by Rumpole
Herald columnist Fred Grimm stomped on Senator Rubio right back, picking up the mantle and defending Judge Will Thomas. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Jeff Gamso
Beyond that, setting them aside is what we do.If we can't do that, we're in the wrong business.If we don't understand that, we may defend the criminally accused, but we're not criminal defense lawyers.  [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
So the plaintiff came up short in New York, even though market share liability was a something cognized by that state’s highest court.Since we don’t like market share liability, we like Moreno.  [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:01 am by Ken Lammers
Code sec. 19.2-306, a judge can impose time which has previously suspended upon finding "good cause to believe that the defendant has violated the terms of suspension."   [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:42 am
We get to laugh, just like we get to laugh at stuff like this: [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
On Wednesday, U.S District Court Judge Virginia Phillips issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) law. [read post]