Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1 - 20 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2013, 9:40 am by John M. Kaman
 So you will tend to believe a cop even if you really try to be neutral and you will say to yourself "something must have been done and badly done or we wouldn't be having a trial.This leads to the biggest joke of all which is that the defendant is not obligated to take the stand and the jury shall not take his/her silence as evidence of guilt. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:58 pm by Jeff Gamso
They do so at the expense of the defendant. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
On Wednesday, U.S District Court Judge Virginia Phillips issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) law. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
 I'll always vote to kill - unless the aggravating circumstances don't outweigh mitigation (which, and now mumbling they always do because the guy is dead and the defendant's a killer who, Q.E.D., should be killed.)It's a dance and a farce. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:42 am
We get to laugh, just like we get to laugh at stuff like this: [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:00 pm by Rumpole
Herald columnist Fred Grimm stomped on Senator Rubio right back, picking up the mantle and defending Judge Will Thomas. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
  We don't know.The thing is, it's easy to carp from where I sit. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
But I know the judge reads this column, and he knows I am right: We penalize defendants who dare stand on their constitutional rights, making a mockery of justice. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
As one friend wrote on his Facebook wall, if you had a favorite character in GoT, maybe now you don't. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:08 am
'The whole concept of privacy is obsolete,' 'Gathering data about phone calls doesn't raise serious privacy concerns,' 'Surveillance is unobjectionable if it's been going on for many years,' 'We don't have to worry about the 4th Amendment as long as a judge is willing to rubber-stamp the government's actions without any adversarial process,' etc." [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:38 pm by Chuck Peterson
While there is no requirement that a defendant ever prove anything at trial, don't kid yourself. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:01 am by Bill
I don't want any judge compromising the veneer of neutrality when my client says that we we or will not do what the judge recommends, and in a lot of legal cultures the mere fact that a judge would engage in such conduct would be shocking. [read post]