Search for: "Wear v. Kansas" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
So holds the Kansas Court of Appeals, in reasoning that applies equally to any clothing that displays a message; the defendant in this particular case was on trial for setting fire to a truck that was displaying Confederate flags.From today's Kansas Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 8:22 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 108855 (D KS, August 7, 2014), a Kansas federal district court dismissed free exercise, equal protection and Indian Religious Freedom Act claims challenging prison dress policy that limited adherents of Native American religious to wearing white bandana headbands at religious ceremonies, and denied them permission to wear colorful headbands.In Dushane v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm by Howard Friedman
Sullivan,(9th Cir., April 12, 2017), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's RLUIPA complaint regarding restrictions on the wearing of dreadlocks.In Clark v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 19935 (D KA, Feb. 7, 2018), a Kansas federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that for 3 weeks he was denied a special diet he needed for religious reasons.In Sajous v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 35642 (D KS, March 23, 2015), a Kansas federal district court refused to grant summary judgment to defendants on complaints by a Muslim inmate that he was denied access to an Eid ul Fitr meal because he was in disciplinary segregation.In Banks v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
 Kansas Statutes § 21–3428.State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:06 am by SHG
(For a case involving the First Amendment and student blackface, although in a situation that did seem like mockery of blacks, see Iota Xi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:30 am
Plaintiff prisoner alleged that he was denied substitutions for menu items forbidden by his religion and tht he was prevented from wearing his religious headwear in the library.In Sacred Feather v. [read post]