Search for: "Webster v. Cooper" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Mostyn J also held that the implied undertaking bound not just the parties receiving the disclosure of their spouses, but also the media (following the lead of Roberts J in Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
”  It asserted that unredacted versions would “disclose law enforcement investigation techniques, procedures, and guidelines,” by revealing “interagency cooperation procedures” and guidelines for when spouses and children trigger . . . for further security investigation and [for] how to conduct that process. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
The original may be accessed HERE; another HERE (which includes the original Chinese).It follows below:Credits: This translation was produced by Rogier Creemers and Graham Webster on the basis of DigiChina's earlier translation of the of the second review draft of the law, which in turn was based on our translation of the first draft, produced by Rogier Creemers, Mingli Shi, Lauren Dudley, and Graham Webster. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Kristian Soltes
This is important because it marks the dawn of a new kind of business with the potential for lower transaction costs and large-scale cooperative efforts between people who do not even need to know each other, let alone trust each other, as they would in a traditional business structure. . . . [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In September, federal court justice Jacqueline Gleeson ordered the payout to Anne Webster MP over Facebook posts in April 2020 by Australian conspiracy theorist Karen Brewer. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Even Webster accepted the expansion of slavery into new states, chastised the North for not cooperating in returning fugitive slaves to their southern masters, and criticized abolitionists and “extremists” for hurting their own cause. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cooper, Federal Practiceand Procedure § 4409 (2d ed. 2002). [read post]