Search for: "Webster v. Doe" Results 161 - 180 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
At the six-digit subheading level, the subject merchandise does not fall within the terms of HTSUS Subheading 9013.10.Secondary sources: McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms (4th ed. 1989); The Oxford English Dictionary (2d ed. 1989); Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1986). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:38 pm
The California Supreme Court held that high blood pressure (hypertension) may be a protected disability condition within the meaning of Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) in American National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by John Floyd
  In a May 30, 2017 decision, Ledezma-Cosino v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the defendants established that, to the extent that the cause of action alleging legal malpractice was predicated upon Jindra’s disability insurance claim matter, it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations (see Webster v Sherman, 165 AD3d 738, 741; Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 735). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am by Giles Peaker
For example, does ‘used for sleeping’ as in the Collins and the UT’s version of Merriam-Webster, necessarily mean at the present moment? [read post]