Search for: "Weeds, Inc. v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 10:21 am
A decision in Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
The FDA recently sent warning letters to officials with a seafood processing plant in Brooklyn, NY, and a company in Puerto Rico that makes seasoning mixes for export to the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. includes owners of 5 of the 448 parcels affected by a renourishment project. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
Boutrous Jr. for petitioners (Art Lien) Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
FMC Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The defendants argued that the trial judge had taken a holistic approach to assessment of infringement and that the Court should instead apply an approach similar to the “abstraction-filtration-comparison” approach used to assess substantiality in the context of computer software infringement in the United States per Computer Associates International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
That has the advantage of creating a direct circuit split over the extent of PMA preemption, and direct circuit splits are one thing upon which successful United States Supreme Court appeals are based.But on TwIqbal, what Bausch is conceptually worse than just disagreeing with a decision we like. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
For a similar (though not identical) case, see the Where the Wild Libel Lawsuits Are case from the Texas Supreme Court (New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
