Search for: "Weeks v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 37,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2025, 5:36 am
Claybrooks v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 5:10 am
Patents and SPCsRose Hughes reviewed the capabilities and limitations of AI-powered software designed to assist in patent drafting.Katfriend Paul England (Taylor Wessing) discussed the current state of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in the UK, questioning whether the system needs reform, by reviewing the recent English Court of Appeal decision in Merck Serono SA v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks [2025] EWCA Civ 45 (28 January… [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 9:00 am
STATE VOTING RIGHTS ACT Westchester County: Serratto et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:14 am
Behler sued Tao in New York state court for breach of the oral agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Anderson and Trump v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Fradella, How State Courts Apply Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 2:51 am
Last week, I started blogging about my new article Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action, just published by the Florida Law Review. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am
Last week in the courts As mentioned above, on Monday 24 February 2025, there was a statement in open court in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers KB-2024-004147 read before Fordham J. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 4:18 am
Paul Jennings & Thérèse Rankin, Bates Wells: Navigating the expression of protected beliefs and social media use in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v Farmor’s School. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
Law v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
I'll reproduce the Abstract and Introduction today, and continue to post the rest of the article next week. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 6:09 am
Earlier this week the CJEU provided its ruling in the highly anticipated case of BSH Hausgeräte v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:41 am
Under Miller v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
Supreme Court precedent in a public-official libel finding (New York Times v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
Glossip had also argued that the prosecution did not turn over exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
In this judgment Petchey Ch stated that he need not go into the arguments arising [emphasis in original]. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 3:12 am
Lupach v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm
Moore, involve state surveying laws. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:15 pm
As I explained in my first post, in my view it was easily defensible for the Department to conclude (as seems quite plausible) that forcing the Mayor to sit through a four-to-six week trial would impair Department's enforcement priorities, justifying the dismissal motion. [read post]
