Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 1 - 20
of 7,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm
Michael Flynn's Brother v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Jackson, which has been consolidated under United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
How this left-leaning bench happens in a deep-red state confounds me. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Now let me turn to Prof. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Thus, like the Ohio-specific deadline for ballot access, state-specific (and thus disuniform) rules concerning elector allocation will persist under our decentralized electoral college framework.A third reminder (for me) this week of the extent of decentralization was the mention by a colleague and frequent co-author (Professor Evan Caminker) of the outcome of the 2020 Texas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
So back to state court you go.That all seems right to me, for the exact reasons Judge Callahan articulates. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am
Last week, I wrote about Atlantic Works v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:04 am
In 2000, just before the Bush v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
But not by me. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Let me try to explain why. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
Let me say that again: EPA repeatedly violated the law. [read post]
