Search for: "Weiss v. Marcus" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Broker-dealers, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Jurisdiction, Liability standards, Regulation SHO, SEC,Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Short sales, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable? [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
  This careful use of language is definitely on display in the recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Neurim v Mylan[1] where the Court of Appeal has dismissed Neurim’s appeal against the rejection of its application for a preliminary injunction, but at the same time politely picked apart significant sections of the reasoning of Marcus Smith J at first instance. [read post]
Nevertheless, in a judgment dated 3 June 2020, Marcus Smith J refused to grant an interim injunction to Neurim against the leading generics company Mylan. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Weiss, President, American Society of International Law; and Professor, Georgetown University Law Center Diane  P. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]