Search for: "Weiss v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, which made it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States (consolidated with two other cases), which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:51 am
The case is Kristina Hill, Brian Edwards and Thomas Privitere v Public Advocate of the United States, Civil Action No. 12-cv-02550-WYD-KMTBrian Edwards and Thomas Privitere became engaged in December 2009. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
United States and its progeny.” [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:34 am
Although the Supreme Court decided in Weiss v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
At the WSJ Law Blog, Joe Palazzolo reports that Paul Clement has advised corporate counsel to pay close attention to the outcome of United States v. [read post]