Search for: "Weiss v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 8:02 am by admin
Decision issued September 8, 2020: “Goren v Barnett” — “From 2010 to approximately 2013, the law firm of Amstein & Lehr LLP (Arnstein & Lehr) represented the Regional Center as securities counsel in various matters related to its EB-5 program administered by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
“The organization was treating its scan of Nefertiti like a state secret,” Wenman wrote in Reason. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
“The organization was treating its scan of Nefertiti like a state secret,” Wenman wrote in Reason. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:54 am
OFAC made clear that the guidance was intended for U.S. companies as well as non-U.S. companies that conduct business in or with the United States, with U.S. persons, or using U.S. origin goods or services. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday evening the United States Department of Justice filed a statement in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Pruitt, Jones Day, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Reporting regulation, Retail investors, SEC, SEC enforcement FCPA and the Commodity Exchange Act: A New Relationship Posted by David Yeres, David DiBari, and Robert Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Anti-corruption, CFTC, Commodity… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]