Search for: "Wellington v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
R (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 72; [2008] WLR (D) 380 “A mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole imposed for two offences of murder in the first degree did not amount to inhuman or degrading punishment so that the Secretary of State had not acted unlawfully in [...] [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:18 am
Regina (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “A mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole which would be imposed on a prisoner convicted of two offences of murder in the first degree did not amount to inhuman or degrading punishment so as to justify a refusal to extradite him [...] [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:00 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0639, 2012 MT 173N, CLIVE WELLINGTON KINLOCK, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently asked itself the same question (as the title to this article asks) in Wellington Resource Group LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The claim was not sufficiently covered according to McAdams and he eventually filed suit against Palomar, an out of state defendant, and against Wellington and Nicholas, both in-state defendants. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
As a young man in the 1970s working for Wellington Civil Engineering, a business that was going to the wall, he borrowed £5,000 and took over one of Wellington’s contracts to put sewers in in Penley, near Wrexham. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
By Jack Wass (Stout Street Chambers, Wellington, New Zealand)   In the recent decision of Hebei Huaneng Industrial Development Co Ltd v Shi,[1] the High Court of New Zealand was faced with an argument that a money judgment of the Higher People’s Court of Hebei should not be enforced because the courts of China are not independent of the political arms of government and therefore do not qualify as “courts” for the purpose of New Zealand’s rules on the… [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 3:04 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Chatsworth as Wellington Green, 240 So. 3d 6 (quoting BallenIsles Country Club, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 12:32 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Chatsworth as Wellington Green, 240 So. 3d 6 (quoting BallenIsles Country Club, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The contours of that right are not clear, but they do not protect a former Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn who lost his job after the DA learned that his father was running for office against a State Senator who was being prosecuted by his office.The case is Sharpe v. [read post]