Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 341 - 360 of 593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Disproportionate effort: the obligation to respond to a wide-ranging SAR In some previous case law the courts have on occasion been willing to reject “disproportionate” requests, or those which apparently attempt to circumvent standard disclosure (see for example, Ezsias v Welsh Ministers [2007] All ER (D) 65, Elliot v Lloyds TSB Bank PLC [2012] EW Misc 7 (CC) and Durant v Financial Services Authority [2004] FSR 28)  In contrast, in AB the… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:53 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In an opinion by Justice Lloyd Karmeier for a unanimous Court, the Justices held in Nelson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post, we had detailed the facts in the Enercon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News  Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
In M A Lloyd & Sons Ltd (t/a KPM Marine) v PPC International Ltd (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2014] EWHC 41 (QB), ‘Charles Henry’, for the Claimant, had failed to file a witness statement by the date ordered, or indeed at all, (though a ‘curious document’ was served). [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am by Venkat Balasubramani
[Y]ou butt pirate faggots… Joshua L. was not friends with either E.V. or Lloyd S. and did not direct the message to them in any way. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They propose a “meaningful modification” of the Court’s holding in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]