Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 401 - 420 of 577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Dacre v Grant Despite Steve Coogan’s claim that “This is not, in case the press try to portray it that way, the Steve and Hugh show”, the dispute between Hugh Grant and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre bookended module one. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  And the land registration machinery is precisely in point because the buyer must be entitled to rely on that machinery in the Act, otherwise there would be chaos (well, for property lawyers at least); further the purpose of the standard condition is to protect the seller against possible claims by the buyer, not the imposition of a new personal obligation on the buyer ([62]).Now, I have to admit that I buy into Lloyd LJ’s reasoning. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  And the land registration machinery is precisely in point because the buyer must be entitled to rely on that machinery in the Act, otherwise there would be chaos (well, for property lawyers at least); further the purpose of the standard condition is to protect the seller against possible claims by the buyer, not the imposition of a new personal obligation on the buyer ([62]).Now, I have to admit that I buy into Lloyd LJ’s reasoning. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
Kitchin LJ (¶ 28) suggests that the decision could be per incuriam, while Lloyd LJ (¶39) suggests that it is inconsistent with Agnew. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
It launched Lloyd’s new Reuters Institute publication “Scandal! [read post]