Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 121 - 140 of 592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am by Dave
It was pointed out that it may well take a considerable time for suitable accommodation to be found for Sam and that the household would have to live in temporary accommodation in the meantime that may well be less than suitable.  [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am by Dave
  It was pointed out that it may well take a considerable time for suitable accommodation to be found for Sam and that the household would have to live in temporary accommodation in the meantime that may well be less than suitable. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
Larkden Pty Limited -v- Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 268 Lid dip: Steve White [read post]
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
” This formulation extends beyond category 1 cases and covers the cases that would fall within a tightly defined version of category 2 as well. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Andy
In Shelley Films Ltd v Rex Features Ltd [1994], a film set was found to meet this criterion. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
However, it appears to me that the model that the Court followed was precisely that of cases where a duty of care to children was found in relation to social services functions, (e.g J.D & others v East Berkshire NHS Trust & others [2003] Lloyd’s Law Reports 552 or Pierce v Doncaster MBO [2007] EWHC 2968). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:As is well-known, the Court of King’s Bench in Marshall v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
In M A Lloyd & Sons Ltd (t/a KPM Marine) v PPC International Ltd (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2014] EWHC 41 (QB), ‘Charles Henry’, for the Claimant, had failed to file a witness statement by the date ordered, or indeed at all, (though a ‘curious document’ was served). [read post]