Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd"
Results 141 - 160
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Vendors of goods and services utilize standard form contracts to reduce or minimize transaction costs and to ensure consistency in the terms applied to similar transactions. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The question is not whether expert witnesses relied upon “scientific studies,” but whether their causal conclusions and claims are well supported, under scientific standards, by the studies upon which they relied. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:37 pm
Take the recent case of Lloyd v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Guest Post by Colleen V. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
He accepted that the correct approach was as per the case of The Abqaiq [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 18, which states that the requirement was for “documents which objectively [the charterers] would or could have appreciated substantiated each and every part of the claim”, so that they “were thereby put in possession of the factual material which they required in order to satisfy themselves that the claim was well-founded”. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
A well drafted contract will integrate the force majeure provision into the other terms of the contract including the termination provisions. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London et al. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:54 pm
In Cajun Conti LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:35 pm
As well, the Supreme Court has affirmed [in Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence, heard 16 to 19 March 2020 (Warby J) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 12 March 2020 (Nicklin J) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v V [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 10:05 pm
., but, to paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen, we know Donald Trump, and he is no Herbert Hoover. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm
It’s well to think of force majeure as a species of the impossibility defense to a breach of contract that has been available in the law since 1863. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 8:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Paul Tweed LLP the well known specialist reputation firm in Belfast and London has been bought by listed legal services group Gateley for £2 million. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
Brace yourself (for export turbulence) 2020 could well be a year of data export turmoil – so brace yourself! [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm
Following last years post here is my selection of most notable privacy and data protection cases across 2019: Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 The data protection class action against Google which found that they are permissible in the case of DPA breaches for the Safari Workaround. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
The claimant in Lloyd v Google sought damages on behalf of a class of more than 4 million iPhone users affected by Google’s acquisition and use of information generated by their Safari browsers. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The marks were therefore considered visually similar to an average degree.The signs were also considered conceptually similar since they both convey the concept of a whale.Assessment of the likelihood of confusionIt follows from the wording of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR that the concept of a likelihood of association is not an alternative to that of a likelihood of confusion but serves to define its scope (C-342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik). [read post]