Search for: "Wells v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F.2d 741 (11th Cir. 1986), with Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
  The court found that at the time Katie Wells used Ortho’s product in fall of 1980, Ortho was negligent in failing to warn about an increased risk of birth defects that “might” arise from use of the product. 615 F. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:45 am by Schachtman
So Ortho lost the liability issue in the Wells case, which turned on historical knowledge in 1980. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:14 pm
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:42 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 2008 WL 2683047 (E.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 615 F. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 615 F. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
  This principle could certainly apply to innovator manufacturers as well in circumstances where the manufacturer could not make the proposed changes without government assistance.Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Woodill v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ill. 1996). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
A slight association might well be one that is a merely doubling or tripling of base rate for the outcome. [read post]