Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 21 - 40 of 9,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:17 pm
Seeking wisdom, the Supreme Court considered decisions from other states as well as the Restatement of Torts. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by webmaster
Concepcion] essentially preempts all California law relating to unconscionability,” the Mission Viejo panel sharply rejected this absolutist interpretation of Concepcion, stating:  “We disagree, as the case [Concepcion] simply does not go that far.”   [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Gary Rosin
Klein, a psychometrician previously consulted by the California Bar examiners, as well as those of most of the other states. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:15 pm by Richard Burt
LCP VII Holdings LP was a foreign partnership with interests in entities both inside and outside of the United States, and it had California-source income from pass-through entities. [read post]
Meanwhile, out-of-state employers are well-served by seeking counsel before hiring employees in California or even sending employees to the Golden State to conduct business on a temporary basis. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
")  Culminating in a sentence that reads "We agree with Palmieri that some of her conduct, such as misleading a quasi-judicial officer, may well present grounds for the State Bar to investigate her. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm by Brett A. Overby
By the close of 2020, the Supreme Court will issue a decision that may very well strike at the heart of the so-called “California Rule. [read post]