Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 12,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
”   “California courts may exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents ‘on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
A defamation lawsuit was filed earlier this month in a California state trial court by Fresno, California, Catholic priest Msgr. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am by Elizabeth Dalziel
On November 23, 2016, Wells Fargo successfully defended a class action lawsuit relating to the recent fake account scandal, Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am by Elizabeth Dalziel
On November 23, 2016, Wells Fargo successfully defended a class action lawsuit relating to the recent fake account scandal, Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:56 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
You may recall that in 2010, the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board ruled in Pratt v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am by Cannabis Law Group
Marijuana Delivery Services Vulnerable to Law Enforcement Stop, Search, Seizure Meanwhile, other legal woes relating to California cannabis delivery include a class action lawsuit, Goldman et al v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:50 pm
The California Supreme Court today denied the Application for Stay and Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the case of Bennett v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
But the court agreed with Wells Fargo that punitive damages award was excessive. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:54 am
The State of California Department of Health Services decided that they did not especially want Avril Adams to be employed in that position, she sued, lost at trial, filed another suit, got it dismissed, filed an appeal, and lost again. [read post]
We have recently added New Jersey law to the app, as well as updated it to reflect changes in California law following the long awaited Brinker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
 Judge Gould's dissent says that he "regrets" that he's constrained to disagree, and thinks that especially for entities like Wells Fargo -- a traditional California entity and one with its principal place of business here -- it's silly to say they're not "located" here.But Judge McKeown gets Judge Bybee's vote. [read post]