Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 81 - 100 of 9,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm
Court decisions in other states, as well as California bankruptcy courts, have implied that there are strict rules regarding assigning and recording assignments of Deeds of Trust and Promissory Notes. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm by Barry Barnett
So much so that Golden State courts have struck down class-action bans that show up in consumer contracts whether they apply to lawsuits, Discover Bank v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
In California fear had an early lead as San Quentin prison opened in 1851, just two years after statehood, and well ahead of the University of California which was chartered in 1868. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
New Mexico and Colorado as well as in Masterpiece Cakeshop. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:20 am
California Supreme Court has concluded that California's employment laws govern all work performed within the state, regardless of the residence or domicile of the worker, citing Tidewater Marine Western Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
But a published California case expressly states that the clear and convincing evidence standard applies on appeal as well as in the trial court. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Last month, California State Senator Noreen Evans introduced a bill, SB 982, to require corporations to issue a report on planned political spending as well as expenditures for the previous fiscal year. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:22 am by Micah Gates, RWS, WDTN
That case arose out of California, where state prisons had been operating at around 200% capacity for at least 11 years. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
The California Plaintiffs are at the center of this appeal because the parties dispute the preclusive effect of the settlement from the California action: Lofton v. [read post]