Search for: "Wells v. Wilkins"
Results 1 - 20
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 9:09 am
IRS v Biglaw. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
Of course, it can be hard to craft a sustained narrative about those cases when many deal with relatively obscure statutes that the court rarely examines – such as the Quiet Title Act, the subject of this year’s less than momentous decision in Wilkins v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
The opinion, though careful and well-written, is almost entirely standard fare. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
The opinion, though careful and well-written, is almost entirely standard fare. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
Judge Wilkins dissented. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
In Schaerr v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
” – Stephanie Wilkins, editor-in-chief of Legaltech News. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:28 am
Wilkins, 225 N.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:29 am
The agency did not fare so well in GPA Midstream Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
The RFI raises a panoply of questions about both competition and consumer-protection issues, well beyond the scope of the rule, that may pertain to franchise businesses. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm
In a published opinion authored by Judge Wilkins, joined by Chief Judge Srinivasan and Judge Rao, the Court of Appeals held that Qatar could not file an appeal under the “well settled” rule that only a “party” may appeal an adverse judgment. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm
NLRB did not fare as well as EPA and FCC. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Scott Perry and the Assault on the 2020 Election Perry’s interference in the 2020 presidential election is well documented – including in media reporting, a Senate Judiciary Committee report in October 2021, and the Jan. 6 Select Committee’s final report. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:05 pm
Judge Randolph (joined by Judges Wilkins and Rogers) held that the requests to end the trusteeship and schedule elections were moot because, well, the trusteeship had ended and elections had occurred. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
We submitted it yesterday and can be found here, https://sct.narf.org/documents/arizona_v_navajo/amicus_professors.pdf, and I really want to thank my co-authors, Dan McCool and David Wilkins. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Wilkins, “The In-House Counsel Movement, Metrics of Change,” The Practice, May/June 2016. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Well, it is Christmas again, so why not repost it as I’ve done in the past? [read post]