Search for: "Wendel v. Wendel" Results 21 - 40 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 7:27 am
Peter Schmidt reviews the application of Garcetti v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 7:33 am by ernst
UrofskyStephen Budiansky, Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas Catherine Pierce Wells, Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Willing Servant to an Unknown GodMichael H. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:50 am
Here is a Topeka Capital-Journal article reporting that Wendell Betts won in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:25 am by Gerard Magliocca
Most of you know that Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was not a fan of federal common law. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 12:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery On November 5, 2003, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted appellant, Everette Keeton, of numerous crimes in connection with the armed robbery of an International House of Pancakes in Marlow Heights, Maryland. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:11 pm by Elie Mystal
Galloway, Greg Abbott, Mike Sacks, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Politics, Religion, Rick Hasen, Sharia, Sharia law, Shariah law, Texas, Thomas Healy, US Airways, USAIR, Voting Rights     [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Library of Congress has posted its Constitution Day event, a September 14, 2022, conversation between Mark V. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:31 am by ernst
Now available on-line to subscribers to Cambridge Core: the Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise volume on the Supreme Court under Charles Evans Hughes, The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930 to 1941, by Mark V. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Barnett's critique of "minimum rationality" when used mindlessly to uphold rent seeking regulation like that in Williamson v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
(NYPL)Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]