Search for: "West v. State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 2,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
For example, in 2021, prior to the West Virginia decision, a federal court held that the Clean Air Act implicitly preempts climate adaptation claims brought under New York law. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
This being a blog, I will also link to a recent piece of mine on institutional actors in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:54 pm
In an article published on February 14, 2009, the New York Times reported on the Caperton v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
  This does not however mean that the rationale for that decision, which is binding in Member States, applies to the position between England on the one hand and a country which is not a Member State, whether or not that State is a party to the New York Convention. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am by Joseph A. Ranney
 New York’s legal influence on Wisconsin was compounded by the fact that many early Wisconsin settlers came from New York and that many Wisconsin lawyers had obtained their training there before moving west. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am by Vicki Shiah
Last week, air pollution litigation was a prominent theme at the office of the New York State Attorney General, which announced major developments in two separate matters. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, the Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes, et al contend that the United States Department of Energy (DOE, & Secy. [read post]
” Initially, the plaintiffs in the case sought an injunction from Judge Philip Halpern of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York but were denied. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Thus, Respondent's policy is discriminatorily preventing Claimant from using Respondent's services in the City of New York....Respondent has violated the New York City and New York State human rights laws by discriminating on the basis of religion, national origin and/or citizenship and also by engaging in a discriminatory boycott.Legal Insurrection blog reports in more detail on the case. [read post]