Search for: "Westfall v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 4:46 pm
Vladeck (Georgetown University Law Center and American University - Washington College of Law) have posted State Law, the Westfall Act, and the Nature of the Bivens Question after Minneci v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:45 am
Vladeck (Georgetown University Law Center and American University - Washington College of Law) have posted State Law, the Westfall Act, and the Nature of the Bivens Question after Minneci v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
In considering whether the President is a federal employee for purposes of the Westfall Act in the Carroll v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 7:23 am
Haley (05-593) before the Supreme Court:FEDERAL EMPLOYEE LIABILITY, FEDERAL JURISDICTION, REMOVAL, REMAND, FEDERAL TORTS CLAIM ACT, GENERAL FEDERAL OFFICER REMOVAL STATUTE, GENERAL REMAND STATUTE, WESTFALL ACT, SCOPE-OF-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATIONOsborn v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
Odfjell Westfal-Larsen, et. al, (the U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:20 am
Richard Westfall at Rocky Mountain Appellate Blog wrote up the first SCOTUS opinion authored by Justice Sotomayor, Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:02 pm
The United States then filed a petition for removal, as the Westfall Act permits. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 10:35 am
And more broadly, the reasoning in CAIR v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
In Westfall v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Jean Carroll v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Jean Carroll v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
The detainees argued that (1) the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The state court case was removed to federal court on diversity grounds and the Second Circuit had to determine whether Trump's allegedly defamatory comments were made within the scope of his employment as President of the United States.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
New England, 546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006); see also United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm
Congress intervenes when it wants, as it did after the Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:24 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm
Check the Hui v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
That’s what the law was under the Westfall v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:31 am
I previously reported on the Stafford County case of Suzanne Brown v. [read post]
