Search for: "Wetzler v. Wetzler"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
Administrative Law Licensing; standing Robert Wetzler, M.D., is the subject of an investigation by the State of Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:43 pm
Oral Argument in case: 08-2923; Thomas Wetzler v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:46 am
In Wetzler v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the court rejected Scott’s argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
The PTO (represented by Lauren Wetzler and Steve Walsh) was more polished in contrast to the preliminary injunction arguments. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:31 am
(Case U-4642, Matter of Nassau County Chapter CSEA) Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, illustrates an application of the general rule that except in life-threatening situations, or in situations where the employee is asked to perform a clearly unlawful act, if an employee objects to complying with a superior's directive, he or she should "work now, grieve later. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:22 pm
Patent attorney Jill Browning attended today’s Tafas v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
In Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
” In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott’s argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” Introducing the personnel record: In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott's argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
