Search for: "Whiskey Cases" Results 21 - 40 of 586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 12:00 am
The prosecution under AZ law has the burden of proving its DUI case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am by INFORRM
In this case, VIP Products made a chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s whiskey. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am by Eugene Volokh
The necessity, in the latter case, I conceive greater, because in a republic more is dependent on the good opinion of the people for its support, as they are, directly or indirectly, the origin of all authority, which of course must receive its bias from them. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:15 am by Carrie Richey
While the justices felt that artistic expression versus trademark use was cut and dried in this instance, that is not always the case in litigation focused on NFTs and the Metaverse. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:15 am by Carrie Richey
While the justices felt that artistic expression versus trademark use was cut and dried in this instance, that is not always the case in litigation focused on NFTs and the Metaverse. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Here’s what Alessandro writes:Whiskey and dog toys: SCOTUS decision on First Amendment protection for expressive worksby Alessandro CerriIn a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of the United States (the Court) held that the lower court had erred in finding that a dog toy which parodied Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle was protected by the First Amendment’s free speech protections.BackgroundThis case began when VIP Products, the maker of the “Bad Spaniels”… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Harper, a case that has been pitched as a seismic clash between two troubling positions. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am by SHG
When discussing Title IX cases, most of which (thankfully) are pseudonymous and almost all of which use the “Doe” formulation, it’s difficult to distinguish which case one’s referring to. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Trustees of Indiana University cases just from 2020 to 2022 that have yielded opinions available on Westlaw, all in the same field (higher education law).22 These seem likely to be joined by new cases each year, and they will remain potentially citable for decades to come. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of the Case Respondent VIP Products LLC (VIP) sells the “Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker” dog toy, which resembles a bottle of Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 Black Label Tennessee Whiskey, but has light-hearted, dog-related alterations. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am by INFORRM
The trademark case was initiated due to VIP Products’ sales of a dog chew toy labeled “Bad Spaniels,” designed as a parody of Jack Daniel’s famous whiskey bottle. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
In a case involving a whiskey bottle dog toy with important findings for retailers and brand protection, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s rulings on trademark infringement and trademark dilution in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm by Maliya G. Rattliffe
For more background and detail on the this case, click here. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:33 pm by Cara Gagliano
Trademark law rests on the assumption that knowing who made your cookies (or dog toy, or whiskey) helps you decide what to buy. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am by Ronald Mann
That is not a problem with the central intellectual property cases of this term. [read post]