Search for: "White Motor Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
Specific concerns may arise for LGBTQ+ foreign nationals seeking to come to the United States, or for LGBTQ+ service members in the U.S. armed forces. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
Intergenerational wealth has mainly benefited and exists for white families. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
The underpinning of Daubert is that an expert’s opinion could be unreliable and the jury could not figure that out, even given cross-examination and argument, because the jurors are deferent to a qualified expert (i.e., the white lab coat effect). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
” DOL “public listening sessions” seek input on white-collar regs’ salary level. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
  But that is in fact exactly what the respondent in the recent ruling in Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha t/a Honda Motor Co Ltd v Big Boy Scooter [2017] ZAGPPHC 513 suggested should happen. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]