Search for: "White v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 2:00 pm
Dairy, Inc. (2006) 143 Cal.app.4th 585, and found White v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 5:14 am
 Special Prosecutor Archie Cox Cox soon issued a subpoena to Nixon for the tapes of White House conversations. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 7:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(concurrence, White, J) - Link: http://www.natlawreview.com/article/single-claim-approach-trade-secret-misappropriation#sthash.Jr9aKA99.dpuf [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
 Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 11:55 am
In Cox, white there is a factual description of the defendant's conduct as he refused to be cuffed, there was no language establishing that the underlying arrest of the third party was an authorized one. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
This seems strange, but if that's what the law says, okay, I guess.Second, the holding deepens the mystery behind the age-old question, first posed by the Beatles in the White Album in 1968: to wit, "Why don't we do it in the road? [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Cox, a white woman were indicted under sec. 4189 in a circuit court of Alabama for living together in a state of adultery or fornication, and were tried, convicted, and sentenced, each to two years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  That same day, White House Chief of Staff Bob Haldeman and Assistant for Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman resigned in the wake of allegations of their roles in the cover-up. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Twitter Defeats Yet Another Lawsuit from a Suspended User–Cox v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the White House was only notified 30 minutes before the public announcement was made. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
From his comments, I see no evidence that he has in fact read the Second Circuit’s AFSCME v. [read post]