Search for: "White v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 12,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
The court rejected those arguments because it had already decided in Licavoli v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:04 pm
Mendoza v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm
But internal calls are growing for the police chief to step aside as University of California President Michael V. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:33 am
Over 30 states and dozens of localities have adopted the IHRA definition. [read post]
