Search for: "White v. White" Results 1 - 20 of 16,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2025, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
If not for the unusually high deference to executive decisions on immigration policy wrongly granted by the Supreme Court in cases like Trump v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 12:21 pm by Chris Castle
In 2010, Professor Samuelson wrote up some of the CPPs collective ideas in a “white paper” of sorts called “Copyright Principles Project: Directions for Reform” published in…wait for it…the Berkeley Technology Law Journal. [read post]
18 May 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, the 1908 case People’s Pleasure Park Co v. [read post]
16 May 2025, 11:15 am by Unknown
The Advocate General’s Opinion in LC and LP v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma (Verfassungsblog, May 2025) [text]**For much more news and info on the latest developments, check out the ECRE Weekly Bulletin. [read post]
15 May 2025, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
These scholars likewise ignore the rationale of the landmark 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 4:37 am by Weronika Galka
The Homeland Security Department is planning to acquire a new Gulfstream V jet, an agency official confirmed yesterday. [read post]
14 May 2025, 10:43 am by Christopher Bosch and Lucas Amodio
Since President Trump reentered the White House, the SEC has undertaken numerous steps to bring some order to crypto regulation. [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As ostensibly private law arrangements, racial covenants escaped constitutional constraints until 1948, when Shelley v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Mary Anne Franks
The strategies of doxing, trolling, conspiracy theories, and memes used by far-right extremists today were developed on white supremacist online bulletin boards in the 1980s and 90s. [read post]
14 May 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But it's pretty much the remedy the Court approved in 2017 in Sessions v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 9:09 pm by Chris Castle
Such an arrangement is not only inconsistent with Madisonian theory but also violates the anti-commandeering doctrine as articulated in modern Supreme Court jurisprudence, including Murphy v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 12:00 pm by Leslie Eastman
Newsom Continues Effort to Rebrand Himself as Bill Clinton v. 2.0 first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]