Search for: "Whitehead v. Whitehead" Results 1 - 20 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 7:02 am by Daily Record Staff
When he was arrested, Whitehead had no cocaine in his possession. [read post]
17 May 2022, 5:27 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
I created and posted an 8-minute video summarizing the recent and ongoing brain death conflict in New York: Whitehead v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:51 am
Whitehead and another v Hibbert Pownall & Newton ( a firm); [2008] WLR (D) 96 “Solicitors who had negligently failed to prosecute a claim for damages for clinical negligence, including a claim for future loss, with the result that the claim had been set down at the date of the original claimant's death were not liable for failing to secure for the deceased's estate what, on the full facts, would have amounted a an uncovenanted windfall. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 1:50 pm
Many states even refuse to disclose information about their execution procedures to lawyers whose clients will be subjected to lethal injections.The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:28 am
Whitehead and Another v Hibbert Pownall & Newton (a Firm) Court of Appeal “Where solicitors had negligently failed to prosecute a claim for damages for clinical negligence on behalf of a mother in respect of future losses for a wrongful birth, those losses were curtailed by the death of the mother; the solicitors were not liable in a subsequent claim for professional negligence brought on behalf of the mother's estate for what amounted to a windfall in that,… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:32 am by tracey
Whitehead v Trustees of the Chatsworth Settlement: [2012] EWCA Civ 263;  [2012] WLR (D)  65 “Reasonable practicability was, at least in part, relevant to the assessment of both limbs of the duty on an employer, under regulation 12(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, to take measures to ensure that the exposure of a person using work equipment to any risk to his health or safety from a regulation 12(3) hazard was either… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has held that a pre-filing injunction is appropriate in Whitehead v. [read post]