Search for: "Whitfield v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am by Lai Yip
(“Newegg”) in TQP’s suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 (the “’730 Patent”). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
June — same issue as in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidgger weighs in on Whitfield v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
”  United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am by WIMS
Waxman Statement on Supreme Court's Decision in UARG v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and will rule on whether a jury or a judge should decide the right of an owner of an older trademark to update it and still keep its legal status (Hana Financial v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, United States Supreme Court (1/13/15)Criminal LawWhitfield, fleeing a botched bank robbery, entered 79-year-old Parnell’s home and guided her from a hallway to a room a few feet away, where she suffered a fatal heart attack. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]